Understanding Human Behaviour Without Spoken Words
Edwin Ogie Library is a dynamic platform for education, focused on fostering mindful communication and building positive relationships by eliminating linguistic errors. Our mission is to enhance connections through thoughtful language, emotional regulation, and self-awareness, providing educational resources that inspire personal growth. We aim to promote well-being, peace, and meaningful connections, offering a space for individuals committed to refining their communication skills.
A grown-up children's tale — a gentle mystery that teaches history, care, and respect for heritage.
Markets are where the day writes itself in human tongues: hawkers call in high notes, children chase one another through the legs of stall-owners, and the smell of roasted yam rides a warm wind. In Benin City, the market was a patchwork of canopies and voices, and every thing sold had a history, whether someone asked or not.
Amaka had been walking those alleys since she could grip her grandfather's rough hand. He, Pa Okoro, could tell whether a bowl had once been in a palace, a household, or a stranger’s hand simply by the quiet sound it made when tapped. Amaka loved the way he read things as if they were living sentences. He told stories like someone knows how to make bread — patiently, and with a small gift in each slice.
On a morning that began with stubborn sun, Amaka noticed a stall she had passed hundreds of times but somehow never truly seen. The stall smelled of old cloth and dust; its owner, a man whose teeth showed the slow proof of years, kept things carefully stacked: rusted iron bits, polished cowrie shells, brass bells, and a bundle wrapped in yellowed cotton. The bundle sat higher than the rest, as if it were saving itself for a day worth listening to.
When the owner unwrapped the bundle, a small ivory pendant mask appeared, no larger than Amaka’s open hand. Its ivory had the soft color of tea, and over time its surface had acquired a patina that suggested long touch and long presence. The mask’s face was carved with precise little incisions forming scarification patterns, and tiny crowns and faces lined its rim — motifs Amaka had seen in pictures in old pamphlets at the library but never in the close, private way of holding.
“How much?” Amaka asked, her voice too loud in the hush that seemed to have fallen over the stall. The old man named a price that felt like a secret and, because she had been saving for a small notebook and a pencil set, she counted her coins with fingers that trembled just a little.
Amaka bought the mask. She did not buy it because she believed she owned history; she bought it because the mask seemed to have come with questions she wanted answered. That night she sat by the window with a small lamp and a notebook spread like a map. She placed the mask beside the page and imagined the places it had known: the palm shadow of a woman’s hand, the scent of kola, ritual music that made feet steady. She traced the tiny carvings with the tip of her finger and felt, like a whisper, the weight of choices someone chose to keep.
The morning after, sunlight cut the same way across the courtyard and the mask seemed less like an object and more like an invitation. Amaka decided to examine it more carefully. She turned it over and found, tucked into a small chip along the edge, a thread — red as a fruit — and inside the little hollow, a sliver of folded paper.
She unfolded the paper as if unwrapping a tiny parcel. Drawn across it was a curving line that could have been a river or a road, a starburst that seemed to mark a place, and a series of numbers and small notes — marks of time or memory. The paper smelled faintly of old ink and smoke, the smell of houses that have seen too many seasons.
Pa Okoro peered with eyes reduced and bright from many years. “This,” he said slowly, “is not an ordinary tag. When I was young, elders taught us a way to read memory on a page. Not everyone knows it now. You found a scrap of a story.”
That small piece of paper made the mask even more alive in Amaka’s eyes. A map is a promise; it implies movement and choices. The thought that this tiny pendant might have been moved to hide or to save made Amaka feel as if history itself had become a person who could be comforted or questioned.
She wrapped the mask in clean cloth and placed it with the paper on her desk. She wanted to know whether the marks on the paper were a family memory-route, a record of hiding, or something else. And she wanted, in a small private way, to learn the right steps: not to take, not to sell, but to ask. The mask had arrived in her life and, like a dropped object, had the power to change the shape of what came next.
Amaka’s curiosity led her to the old library at the corner of the town square where the paperbacks smelled of glue and time. The library was small and cool; shelves were lined with booklets typed on aging machines, and in a corner a faded map of the kingdom hung pinned under glass. There she met Professor Ekhator, a woman who wore a shawl like a cloak of questions and who had the habit of listening before she spoke.
Professor Ekhator cradled the mask the way one might hold a small, sleeping bird. She explained, with the patient cadence of someone who had taught many, that many courts had specially made ivory pendants and masks used during ceremonies. Some honored powerful women, mothers of rulers, or significant figures in the lineage. Each carving and mark had meaning — family signs, maker's marks, and small details that told the object's social life. She mentioned the old raids, the times when war or colonial soldiers took things by force, and some objects later surfaced in faraway markets and museums.
“Objects are not only beautiful,” she said. “They are language. When we lose them, we lose words in our story.”
Amaka scribbled notes in her notebook and felt the strange weight of responsibility press into her chest. She thought about selling the mask — the money could buy books and school supplies. But she also imagined the face of the woman whose hands once smoothed the mask as if setting a child right. She decided to keep the mask close and to ask questions aloud before making any decisions.
The professor suggested a careful plan: document the mask thoroughly, photograph it, record its measurements, and compare its marks with records at the palace archive. “If it is from the palace,” she said, “we will talk to the elders. If it is not, we still learn. The way we ask matters.”
And so Amaka began a small research project. She learned how to measure the curve of ivory, how to note patina and tiny abrasions, and how even small threads — like the red one tucked under the chip — could be meaningful. In doing so she began to understand that history is made of small patient practices: listening, recording, and asking permission.
Respect is a practice before it is a feeling. The professor taught Amaka that the right thing to do often begins with the right way to ask. They gathered photographs, a careful written note about where the mask had been found, and a list of questions: Does the palace archive know of a similar mask? Could this be a court item? Is there a family that remembers?
Pa Okoro, who loved stories more than gossip, insisted on one more thing: that they approach the palace with humility. “We carry the mask properly,” he said, “and we tell the truth. We may find answers, or we may find new questions. Either way, we do not rush what belongs in the care of many.”
They made a promise — small and serious — that they would not sell or trade the mask. Instead, they would return with information and listen. The palace elders were the ones who would help decide the object's path if it belonged to palace memory. Amaka felt like a messenger carrying a note whose ink could change the course of someone's memory.
That night she wrote in her notebook: “We ask, we listen, we record.” It became a ritual: before they left the house each morning, they would say this sentence and fold it like a small charm. This practice steadied them in a world that sometimes prized speed over care.
The palace was a slow art: carved pillars, brass faces mounted like constellations on the gate, and a courtyard where elders moved with the measured pace of those who hold memory. Chief Ifueko, who oversaw the palace museum and the people who cared for old things, received the visitors under a wide mango tree. The palace smelled of beeswax, old wood, and tales that had been rehearsed for decades.
When Chief Ifueko lifted the mask, he did so with ceremony: both hands, a slight bow, and the soft words used when handling the living presence of a thing. He asked to see the map. The curving line and the starburst became, in his hands, a guide that traced the way objects had been moved to keep them safe during troubled times. He hummed, and the humming was like asking a question to the sky.
“Some objects travel to protect themselves,” Chief Ifueko said. “People hide what they love when they fear a world that will not keep them. Others travel because they are taken. There are different types of leaving.”
The palace archivist compared the mask’s scarification patterns to old records. The tiny faces on the crown matched a pattern associated with a family that had once served the Oba. The thread’s color—the red—was used in certain rites. Each discovery did not conclude everything; each discovery only added a careful layer of evidence that asked for more listening.
They agreed to do three things: record the mask with photographs and detailed notes, ask the family that the records suggested might be connected, and open a public conversation so the community could know what was happening. The palace chose conversation instead of secrecy because stories—like gardens—need sunlight to grow justly.
The team followed the paper’s hints. The curving line was not a river at all but a path between compound houses, an old route people used to move important things under cover of everyday busyness. The starburst was a mark families used in their own records to indicate a safe house. Each mark was like a breadcrumb left to be found by people who knew how to read them.
At the house marked, they found the worn trunk in a loft full of dust and the slow sleep of folded cloth. Inside, wrapped in oilcloth brittle with age, lay a second mask: cracked, its chin broken, but unmistakably part of the same creative family. Alongside it was a letter that explained brief things in patient hand: the need to hide items during a troubled season; the hope that one day the city would be whole enough for fine things to return home.
To find a twin object in this way was to feel the closeness of history as a living thing. The letter’s last sentences read like a promise: “We kept these for when the day came that we could tell why we kept them.”
The palace recorded everything. The team made a small film to document the trunk, the loft, and the faces of the people who had guided them. The filmmaker, Tunde, used a patient focus that let the camera breathe with the story. Children watched the footage and leaned forward as if learning to whisper a new prayer. The footage became part of the record — an audiovisual memory that children and future students could use to learn that things carry stories beyond value.
News travels like water. When the palace announced the find and invited conversation, a museum in another country wrote with the discovery that their archives listed an item matching the twin. It had been catalogued and displayed as a piece purchased in the 1930s. The email asked whether they might have a chance to study the two objects together. That was the beginning of a sensitive, slow negotiation.
Conversation revealed many strands: some objects left by force in times of war; some were taken in ways that were murky or poorly recorded; some entered private collections and later surfaced in auctions. What this meant, practically, varied: sometimes museums offered loans, sometimes they offered collaborative exhibits, and sometimes they began discussions about repatriation.
The palace convened a public forum instead of an unreported conference so the community could decide how the story would be told. The market offered shade and folding chairs. People came with questions and songs; some were skeptical of museums whose halls felt cold and far away, others hoped that seeing the masks could teach their children the rituals and the songs that give these objects their meaning.
Chief Ifueko said plainly: “Objects are signposts for stories. If the signposts live far away from the story, we must find ways to bring the story itself closer. That is not only law; it is the practice of care.”
That practice of care led to a plan that included oral histories — interviews with elders and family members who could explain how objects had been used — and collaborative exhibits where museums would work with palace archivists so that any showing of the mask abroad included the palace’s song and explanation. The idea was that a mask should be seen not as a trophy but as a living page in a book that requires its own footnotes.
On the day the conversation began, the air was a quilt of voices. People rose to speak, some angry and short, others gentle and long. A teacher asked how children could learn from real objects rather than photos. An elder asked whether objects could teach humility to the young by showing them truth about the past. A teenager, who had never seen a mask in person, asked simply: “Why did people take them?”
Someone from the foreign museum spoke by video and explained how the object entered their collection long ago. They sounded remorseful, and their words were honest: records were incomplete; some things were acquired on markets; some were bought from middlemen. They offered cooperation: shared research, honest labeling, and, where possible, the return of items whose histories suggested they had been taken by force.
The conversation was not tidy. There were sharp disagreements about compensation, about whether museums were safe keepers, and about how repatriation might work. But there was also a surprising tenderness: a shared desire that young people should not be raised on silence about these things. A group formed to record oral histories, to teach children how to care for old things, and to support local museum conservation so that objects could be kept here with dignity.
The market hummed. Tunde the filmmaker captured faces and phrases that would become part of the archive: a song hummed by an elder who remembered the names of artists, the laughter of children when elders told a silly anecdote about a mischievous court jester, and the hushed voice of an ancestor who insisted that objects need both shelter and song.
Not every conversation ends with immediate returns. Repatriation is complicated: legal systems, archives, and the ethics of museums all bind the process like tight cords. Yet some objects — small and significant — did begin to come home, not in triumphal trunks but accompanied by agreements that described how they had been taken and who had the authority to interpret them.
At a small ceremony, a returned pendant was placed on a simple stand. The palace singers performed a welcoming chant and children gathered to ask questions. The returned object did not make the city complete. It did something perhaps more important: it reopened a conversation, taught young people how to tell a story linked to a thing, and offered an example of how history can be handled with care.
Amaka watched a child run her fingers carefully along the museum ropes and giggle at the strictness of cords that kept things safe. Later, at home, Amaka wrapped the mask in a soft cloth and wrote a small entry in her notebook. She drew the two masks together and under them wrote the sentence that would stay with her: “To return is also to remember.”
Years later she would visit classrooms and show children the pictures and videos recorded during the discovery. She taught them to draw memory-maps of their own objects — to ask where a thing came from and to record the stories family members told. Those maps became exercises in empathy and patience.
Amaka grew up with books and songs. The mask rested on a shelf beside her notebooks. It was neither a god nor a trophy; it was a reminder, a teacher. When children came by her small classroom years later, she placed the mask in a box and taught them how to record the object's story. She taught them that objects are not only beautiful but are signs that point to events, relationships, and histories that carry people’s names.
She also taught that answers are often complicated. An object might have left a place for many reasons: protection, trade, seizure, or even gift. Each leaving required a careful story. Amaka taught her students how to ask gently, how to record what elders said, and how to respect local people’s wishes when it came to handling things that belonged to many.
At the end of lessons she would ask her students to create their own "memory-route" maps for objects in their homes. The exercise made children ask grandparents where a jewelry box had come from, why a chair had been given as a wedding gift, or who had carved a wooden spoon. These conversations stitched children into a living chain of memory, making them participants rather than passive consumers of pictures.
When asked what the lost mask taught her, Amaka would say: “It taught me how to ask. And it taught me how to listen without rushing to fix.” She would tell them that sometimes returning an object is not the only way to heal a story; sometimes sharing the song, the maker’s name, and the circumstances of leaving is just as important. Respect, she would say, is both an action and a habit.
Discussion prompts for families and classrooms
Activity idea — Memory Map Workshop
If this brightened your day, drop a small support
Secure payments via Flutterwave • Thank you for supporting independent educational content.
Comments
Post a Comment
We’d love to hear from you! Share your thoughts or questions below. Please keep comments positive and meaningful, Comments are welcome — we moderate for spam and civility; please be respectful.